New features reached production in a third of the firm's usual time.
A global tech due-diligence advisor hired us for two new tools. Shipping those well earned us work inside its main product.
One month per feature, where the firm's baseline was three.
The difference came from one person carrying the analysis, product decisions, design and code, with fewer handoffs.
| Firm's baseline | With Runpoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Production feature | 3 months | 1 month |
Two new tools first, then work inside the firm's main product.
Staffing matcher
Reads a resume and LinkedIn, tags experience and matches people to projects.
Workforce classifier
Sorts a client's employees by role and seniority, with the reasoning shown.
Live archive lookup
Puts past assessments in front of a partner during a deal call.
Shared starting point
A tested base every new product starts from, so each build costs less.
Work inside the main product had to be earned first.
- 01
Earn access to the core
The first tools stood apart from the main platform. Shipping them well earned work inside it.
- 02
Fewer handoffs
One operator-engineer carried each feature from analysis to code, so less was lost between roles.
“I've found with you guys, I can just let you go to these meetings by yourselves. I don't even need to be there.”
What could come next
The firm is now replacing its legacy data-collection platform with one built around how the work runs today. That work is still in progress.
Is your product team waiting on handoffs?
Tell us what takes too long to ship. We'll say how we would carry it from problem to release and whether we're the right team.